Race row over city B&B

Beachway Lodge and Conference Centre in Nahoon’s Beach Road. Picture: ALAN EASON

Beachway Lodge and Conference Centre in Nahoon’s Beach Road. Picture: ALAN EASON

A BUFFALO City Metro council debate on whether a B&B  owner should be left to operate his business or not reached  boiling point on Wednesday with  racial allegations being slung about.

The heated debate – which had  Speaker Luleka Simon calling councillors to order on numerous occasions – comes after the B&B owner built a double storey building in  his yard that was not on the  approved plan.

The building in question is  Beachway Lodge and Conference Centre in Nahoon’s Beach Road.

It is owned by Lebo and Bandlakazi Nkonki.

The city won a court order in  2009 interdicting the Nkonkis from  running the guesthouse without a  licence . In 2011 another order was  granted interdicting them from  having the residential address rezoned to have a conference centre.

The Nkonkis ignored both orders  and continued to operate illegally.  On October 30, the East London  High Court gave the Nkonkis a  month to close or face arrest.

The council debate about the  B&B led to an intense exchange  between the ruling ANC and opposition councillors.

Councillors bandied around allegations of racism and in the end the  matter was decided by a vote.

The B&B owner had made an application to the city for a permanent departure from the requirements of the metro’s zoning  scheme, to permit the relaxation of  the lateral building line restriction  from 2m to 0m adjacent to the  neighbouring building.

The majority voted against a recommendation by BCM that the application be rejected, with some  saying the recommendation was  meant to frustrate black business  people in the metro.

A letter of objection was lodged  to the city by the B&B’s neighbour,  while later a report, presented to  the planning and economic development mayoral committee by  metro administration, recommended that the application be rejected.

After lengthy arguments between  councillors, agitated ANC councillors decided to ignore the recommendation, and instead the majority voted for the application to be  approved, paving the way for the  business to continue operating.

“I don’t know why administration  is saying this should not be approved. Is it because it’s a black  person making this application?”  the ANC’ s Zukisa Faku said.

“As the ANC we do not agree  with this objection, which we view  in a serious light as this constantly  happens when applications are  received from black people.

“For us this seems like a racial  issue which needs to be addressed  before it gets out of hand.”

Mthetheleli Sam agreed, saying  there were a number of applications by blacks rejected outright  while those from whites were treated with kid gloves.

DA spokesman on development  and planning Rowan Thiele said the  recommendation was correct as the  owner had already illegally constructed extensions to the property  without authorisation.

“When the DA pointed this out,  the ANC turned the issue into a  racial one, claiming that the only  reason it was not supported was  because the property owner was  black, which is not the case. Nowhere in the report does it mention  the race of the owner. This is about  compliance with building regulations and property zoning.”

When things started to get out of  hand, Simon ruled that the matter  be taken to a vote and when it  became clear that the ANC would  condone the illegal extensions, the  DA demanded a division, in which  the individual votes of each councillor are recorded in the minutes.

“This indemnifies those who voted against the proposed relaxation  and condonation from liability, in  the event that the matter goes to  court,” Thiele said.

At the end, 67 councillors voted to  approve the application, 19 voted  against and two abstained from  voting. — asandan@dispatch.co.za

5 total comments on this postSubmit yours
  1. The distance from a boundary wall is a safety issue. Wait until the house next door catches fire and sets their property alight as well.
    Properties that are too close to each other also breed rodents and pests .
    If you do not believe me, read up on the great fire of London.
    BCM, you are ignoring the law and creating a problem, because if everyone else starts building on boundary lines without plans from now on, you are going to have to accept it because you have now set a precident.

  2. @Tron, your assumption is that these fools can see beyond their noses.
    These guys don’t give a hoot. Their philosophy is make a lot of money now so that when s&$t hits the fan, you can skip the country and leave the nation burning behind you.

  3. Civic responsibility, respect for the law, good neighbourliness, treating all as equal before the law regardless of race etc … how dare you “racists” impose your colonial mentality on the “disadvantaged”? This story simply proves, yet again, that the entire ANC doesn’t have a high enough IQ to be a half-wit.

  4. The good news is now these rules should apply for everybody. We can now build where we want too people! No more worrying about silly rules and regulations! The ANC has outvoted the courts!

  5. BCM please tell me,what is the point of having a zoning scheme and its rules& regulations if some people are allowed to bypass it?

Submit your comment

Please enter your name

Your name is required

Please enter a valid email address

An email address is required

Please enter your message

*

DispatchOnline © 2013 All Rights Reserved

Daily Dispatch | Times Media Group

Times Media GroupDMMA Member